The Email Startup Graveyard: Why Most Email Companies Fail

While many email startups have invested millions in solving perceived problems, we at Forward Email have focused on building reliable email infrastructure from scratch since 2017. This analysis explores the patterns behind email startup outcomes and the fundamental challenges of email infrastructure.

[!NOTE] Key Insight: Most email startups don't build actual email infrastructure from scratch. Many build on top of existing solutions like Amazon SES or open-source systems like Postfix. The core protocols work well - the challenge is in the implementation.

[!TIP] Technical Deep Dive: For comprehensive details on our approach, architecture, and security implementation, see our Forward Email Technical Whitepaper 和 About page which documents our complete development timeline since 2017.

The Email Startup Failure Matrix

[!CAUTION] Failure Rate Alert: Techstars alone has 28 email-related companies with only 5 exits - an exceedingly high failure rate (sometimes calculated to be 80%+).

Here's every major email startup failure we could find, organized by accelerator, funding, and outcome:

The Infrastructure Reality Check

[!WARNING] The Hidden Truth: Every single "email startup" is just building UI on top of existing infrastructure. They're not building actual email servers - they're building apps that connect to real email infrastructure.

What Actually Runs Email

graph TD
    A[Email Infrastructure] --> B[Amazon SES]
    A --> C[Postfix SMTP]
    A --> D[Cyrus IMAP]
    A --> E[SpamAssassin]
    A --> F[DKIM/SPF/DMARC]
B --> G[Powers most email APIs]
C --> H[Actual SMTP server everywhere]
D --> I[Handles email storage]
E --> J[Filters spam]
F --> K[Authentication that works]


What "Email Startups" Actually Build
graph LR
    A[Email Startup Stack] --> B[React Native Apps]
    A --> C[Web Interfaces]
    A --> D[AI Features]
    A --> E[Security Layers]
    A --> F[API Wrappers]
B --> G[Memory leaks]
C --> H[Break email threading]
D --> I[Gmail already has]
E --> J[Break existing workflows]
F --> K[Amazon SES with 10x markup]



[!TIP]
Key Pattern for Email Success: The companies that actually succeed in email don't try to reinvent the wheel. Instead, they build infrastructure and tools that enhance existing email workflows. SendGrid, Mailgun和 Postmark became billion-dollar companies by providing reliable SMTP APIs and delivery services - they work with email protocols, not against them. This is the same approach we take at Forward Email.

Why Most Email Startups Fail

[!IMPORTANT]
The Fundamental Pattern: Email client startups typically fail because they try to replace working protocols, while email infrastructure companies can succeed by enhancing existing workflows. The key is understanding what users actually need versus what entrepreneurs think they need.

1. Email Protocols Work, Implementation Often Doesn't

[!NOTE]
Email Statistics: 347.3 billion emails sent daily without major issues, serving 4.37 billion email users worldwide as of 2023.

The core email protocols are solid, but implementation quality varies widely:

Universal compatibility: Every device, every platform supports SMTP, IMAP和 POP3
Decentralized: No single point of failure across billions of email servers worldwide
Standardized: SMTP, IMAP, POP3 are battle-tested protocols from the 1980s-1990s
Reliable: 347.3 billion emails sent daily without major issues

The real opportunity: Better implementation of existing protocols, not protocol replacement.
2. Network Effects Are Unbreakable
Email's network effect is absolute:

Everyone has email: 4.37 billion email users worldwide as of 2023
Cross-platform: Works between all providers seamlessly
Business critical: 99% of businesses use email daily for operations
Switching cost: Changing email addresses breaks everything connected to it

3. They Often Target the Wrong Problems
Many email startups focus on perceived issues rather than real pain points:

"Email is too complex": The basic workflow is simple - send, receive, organize since 1971
"Email needs AI": Gmail already has effective smart features like Smart Reply and Priority Inbox
"Email needs better security": DKIM, SPF和 DMARC provide solid authentication
"Email needs a new interface": Outlook 和 Gmail interfaces are refined through decades of user research

Real problems worth solving: Infrastructure reliability, deliverability, spam filtering, and developer tools.
4. Technical Debt Is Massive
Building real email infrastructure requires:

SMTP servers: Complex delivery and reputation management
Spam filtering: Constantly evolving threat landscape
Storage systems: Reliable IMAP/POP3 implementation
Authentication: DKIM, SPF, DMARC, ARC compliance
Deliverability: ISP relationships and reputation management

5. The Infrastructure Already Exists
Why reinvent when you can use:

Amazon SES: Proven delivery infrastructure
Postfix: Battle-tested SMTP server
Dovecot: Reliable IMAP/POP3 server
SpamAssassin: Effective spam filtering
Existing providers: Gmail, Outlook, FastMail work fine

Case Studies: When Email Startups Fail
Case Study: The Skiff Disaster
Skiff perfectly exemplifies everything wrong with email startups.
The Setup

Positioning: "Privacy-first email and productivity platform"
Funding: Significant venture capital
Promise: Better email through privacy and encryption

The Acquisition
Notion acquired Skiff in February 2024 with typical acquisition promises about integration and continued development.
The Reality

Immediate shutdown: Skiff shut down within months
Founder exodus: Skiff founders left Notion and joined Cursor
User abandonment: Thousands of users forced to migrate

The Accelerator Analysis
Y Combinator: The Email App Factory
Y Combinator has funded dozens of email startups. Here's the pattern:

Emailio (2014): Mobile email client → pivoted to "wellness"
MailTime (2016): Chat-style email → pivoted to analytics
reMail (2009): iPhone email search → acquired by Google → shutdown
Rapportive (2012): Gmail social profiles → acquired by LinkedIn → shutdown

Success Rate: Mixed results with some notable exits. Several companies achieved successful acquisitions (reMail to Google, Rapportive to LinkedIn), while others pivoted away from email or were acqui-hired for talent.
Techstars: The Email Graveyard
Techstars has an even worse track record:

Email Copilot (2012): Acquired → shutdown
ReplySend (2012): Failed completely
Nveloped (2012): "Easy. Secure. Email" → failed
Jumble (2015): Email encryption → failed
InboxFever (2011): Email API → failed

Pattern: Vague value propositions, no real technical innovation, quick failures.
The Venture Capital Trap

[!CAUTION]
VC Funding Paradox: VCs love email startups because they sound simple but are actually impossible. The fundamental assumptions that attract investment are exactly what guarantee failure.

VCs love email startups because they sound simple but are actually impossible:
graph TD
    A[VC Email Startup Pitch] --> B[Sounds Simple]
    A --> C[Seems Obvious]
    A --> D[Technical Moat Claims]
    A --> E[Network Effect Dreams]
B --> F[Everyone uses email!]
C --> G[Email is old and broken!]
D --> H[We'll build better infrastructure!]
E --> I[Once we get users, we'll dominate!]

F --> J[Reality: Email works fine]
G --> K[Reality: Protocols are proven]
H --> L[Reality: Infrastructure is hard]
I --> M[Reality: Network effects unbreakable]


Reality: None of these assumptions hold true for email.
The Technical Reality: Modern Email Stacks
What Actually Powers "Email Startups"
Let's look at what these companies actually run:
graph LR
    A[Most Email Startups] --> B[React Native App]
    B --> C[Node.js API]
    C --> D[Amazon SES]
    D --> E[Existing Email Infrastructure]
F[Forward Email] --> G[100% Custom Node.js JavaScript Stack]
G --> H[Built From Scratch]


The Performance Problems
Memory Bloat: Most email apps are Electron-based web apps that consume massive amounts of RAM:

Mailspring: 500MB+ for basic email
Nylas Mail: 1GB+ memory usage before shutdown
Postbox: 300MB+ idle memory
Canary Mail: Frequent crashes due to memory issues
Thunderbird: High RAM usage up to 90% of system memory


[!WARNING]
Electron Performance Crisis: Modern email clients built with Electron and React Native suffer from severe memory bloat and performance issues. These cross-platform frameworks, while convenient for developers, create resource-heavy applications that consume hundreds of megabytes to gigabytes of RAM for basic email functionality.

Battery Drain: Constant syncing and inefficient code:

Background processes that never sleep
Unnecessary API calls every few seconds
Poor connection management
No third-party dependencies except those absolutely required for core functionality

The Acquisition Patterns: Success vs. Shutdown
The Two Patterns
Client App Pattern (Usually Fails):
flowchart TD
    A[Email Client Launch] --> B[VC Funding]
    B --> C[User Growth]
    C --> D[Talent Acquisition]
    D --> E[Service Shutdown]
A -.-> A1["Revolutionary interface"]
B -.-> B1["$5-50M raised"]
C -.-> C1["Acquire users, burn cash"]
D -.-> D1["Acqui-hire for talent"]
E -.-> E1["Service discontinued"]


Infrastructure Pattern (Often Succeeds):
flowchart TD
    F[Infrastructure Launch] --> G[Revenue Growth]
    G --> H[Market Position]
    H --> I[Strategic Acquisition]
    I --> J[Continued Operation]
F -.-> F1["SMTP/API services"]
G -.-> G1["Profitable operations"]
H -.-> H1["Market leadership"]
I -.-> I1["Strategic integration"]
J -.-> J1["Enhanced service"]


Recent Examples
Client App Failures:

Mailbox → Dropbox → Shutdown (2013-2015)
Sparrow → Google → Shutdown (2012-2013)
reMail → Google → Shutdown (2010-2011)
Skiff → Notion → Shutdown (2024)

Notable Exception:

Superhuman → Grammarly (2025): Successful acquisition with strategic integration into productivity platform

Infrastructure Successes:

SendGrid → Twilio (2019): $3B acquisition, continued growth
Mailgun → Sinch (2021): Strategic integration
Postmark → ActiveCampaign (2022): Enhanced platform

Industry Evolution and Consolidation
Natural Industry Progression
The email industry has naturally evolved toward consolidation, with larger companies acquiring smaller ones to integrate features or eliminate competition. This isn't necessarily negative - it's how most mature industries develop.
Post-Acquisition Transitions
When email companies are acquired, users often face:

Service migrations: Moving to new platforms
Feature changes: Loss of specialized functionality
Pricing adjustments: Different subscription models
Integration periods: Temporary service disruptions

User Considerations During Transitions
During industry consolidation, users benefit from:

Evaluating alternatives: Multiple providers offer similar services
Understanding migration paths: Most services provide export tools
Considering long-term stability: Established providers often offer more continuity

The Hacker News Reality Check
Every email startup gets the same comments on Hacker News:

"Email works fine, this solves a non-problem"
"Just use Gmail/Outlook like everyone else"
"Another email client that will be shut down in 2 years"
"The real problem is spam, and this doesn't solve that"

The community is right. These comments appear on every email startup launch because the fundamental problems are always the same.
The Modern AI Email Grift
The Latest Wave
2024 brought a new wave of "AI-powered email" startups, with the first major successful exit already happening:

Superhuman: $33M raised, successfully acquired by Grammarly (2025) - a rare successful client app exit
Shortwave: Gmail wrapper with AI summaries
SaneBox: AI email filtering (actually works, but not revolutionary)

The Same Old Problems
Adding "AI" doesn't solve the fundamental challenges:

AI summaries: Most emails are already concise
Smart replies: Gmail has had these for years and they work well
Email scheduling: Outlook does this natively
Priority detection: Existing email clients have effective filtering systems

The real challenge: AI features require significant infrastructure investment while addressing relatively minor pain points.
What Actually Works: The Real Email Success Stories
Infrastructure Companies (The Winners)

SendGrid: $3B acquisition by Twilio
Mailgun: $50M+ revenue, acquired by Sinch
Postmark: Profitable, acquired by ActiveCampaign
Amazon SES: Billions in revenue

Pattern: They build infrastructure, not apps.
Email Providers (The Survivors)

FastMail: 25+ years, profitable, independent
ProtonMail: Privacy-focused, sustainable growth
Zoho Mail: Part of larger business suite
We: 7+ years, profitable, growing


[!WARNING]
The JMAP Investment Question: While Fastmail invests resources in JMAP, a protocol that's 10+ years old with limited adoption, they simultaneously refuse to implement PGP encryption that many users request. This represents a strategic choice to prioritize protocol innovation over user-requested features. Whether JMAP will gain broader adoption remains to be seen, but the current email client ecosystem continues to rely primarily on IMAP/SMTP.


[!TIP]
Enterprise Success: Forward Email powers alumni email solutions for top universities, including the University of Cambridge with 30,000 alumni addresses, delivering $87,000 in annual cost savings compared to traditional solutions.

Pattern: They enhance email, don't replace it.
The Exception: Xobni's Success Story
Xobni stands out as one of the few email-related startups that actually succeeded by taking the right approach.
What Xobni Did Right:

Enhanced existing email: Built on top of Outlook instead of replacing it
Solved real problems: Contact management and email search
Focused on integration: Worked with existing workflows
Enterprise focus: Targeted business users with real pain points

The Success: Xobni was acquired by Yahoo for $60 million in 2013, providing a solid return for investors and a successful exit for founders.
Why Xobni Succeeded Where Others Failed

Built on proven infrastructure: Used Outlook's existing email handling
Solved actual problems: Contact management was genuinely broken
Enterprise market: Businesses pay for productivity tools
Integration approach: Enhanced rather than replaced existing workflows

The Founders' Continued Success
Matt Brezina 和 Adam Smith didn't stop after Xobni:

Matt Brezina: Became an active angel investor with investments in Dropbox, Mailbox, and others
Adam Smith: Continued building successful companies in the productivity space
Both founders: Demonstrated that email success comes from enhancement, not replacement

The Pattern
Companies succeed in email when they:

Build infrastructure (SendGrid, Mailgun)
Enhance existing workflows (Xobni, FastMail)
Focus on reliability (Amazon SES, Postmark)
Serve developers (APIs and tools, not end-user apps)

Has Anyone Successfully Reinvented Email?
This is a crucial question that gets to the heart of email innovation. The short answer is: no one has successfully replaced email, but some have successfully enhanced it.
What Actually Stuck
Looking at email innovations over the past 20 years:

Gmail's threading: Enhanced email organization
Outlook's calendar integration: Enhanced scheduling
Mobile email apps: Enhanced accessibility
DKIM/SPF/DMARC: Enhanced security

Pattern: All successful innovations enhanced existing email protocols rather than replacing them.
New Tools Complement Email (But Don't Replace It)

Slack: Great for team chat, but still sends email notifications
Discord: Excellent for communities, but uses email for account management
WhatsApp: Perfect for messaging, but businesses still use email
Zoom: Essential for video calls, but meeting invites come via email

The HEY Experiment

[!IMPORTANT]
Real-World Validation: HEY's founder DHH actually uses our service at Forward Email for his personal domain dhh.dk and has for several years, demonstrating that even email innovators rely on proven infrastructure.

HEY by Basecamp represents the most serious recent attempt to "reinvent" email:

Launched: 2020 with significant fanfare
Approach: Completely new email paradigm with screening, bundling, and workflows
Reception: Mixed - some love it, most stick with existing email
Reality: It's still email (SMTP/IMAP) with a different interface

What Actually Works
The most successful email innovations have been:

Better infrastructure: Faster servers, better spam filtering, improved deliverability
Enhanced interfaces: Gmail's conversation view, Outlook's calendar integration
Developer tools: APIs for sending email, webhooks for tracking
Specialized workflows: CRM integration, marketing automation, transactional email

None of these replaced email - they made it better.
Building Modern Infrastructure for Existing Email Protocols: Our Approach
Before diving into the failures, it's important to understand what actually works in email. The challenge isn't that email is broken - it's that most companies try to "fix" something that already works perfectly.
The Email Innovation Spectrum
Email innovation falls into three categories:
graph TD
    A[Email Innovation Spectrum] --> B[Infrastructure Enhancement]
    A --> C[Workflow Integration]
    A --> D[Protocol Replacement]
B --> E[What works: Better servers, delivery systems, developer tools]
C --> F[Sometimes works: Adding email to existing business processes]
D --> G[Always fails: Trying to replace SMTP, IMAP, or POP3]


Why We Focus on Infrastructure
We chose to build modern email infrastructure because:

Email protocols are proven: SMTP has worked reliably since 1982
The problem is implementation: Most email services use outdated software stacks
Users want reliability: Not new features that break existing workflows
Developers need tools: Better APIs and management interfaces

What Actually Works in Email
The successful pattern is simple: enhance existing email workflows instead of replacing them. This means:

Building faster, more reliable SMTP servers
Creating better spam filtering without breaking legitimate email
Providing developer-friendly APIs for existing protocols
Improving deliverability through proper infrastructure

Our Approach: Why We're Different
What We Do

Build actual infrastructure: Custom SMTP/IMAP servers from scratch
Focus on reliability: 99.99% uptime, proper error handling
Enhance existing workflows: Work with all email clients
Serve developers: APIs and tools that actually work
Maintain compatibility: Full SMTP/IMAP/POP3 compliance

What We Don't Do

Build "revolutionary" email clients
Try to replace existing email protocols
Add unnecessary AI features
Promise to "fix" email

How We Build Email Infrastructure That Actually Works
Our Anti-Startup Approach
While other companies burn millions trying to reinvent email, we focus on building reliable infrastructure:

No pivots: We've been building email infrastructure for 7+ years
No acquisition strategy: We're building for the long term
No "revolutionary" claims: We just make email work better

What Makes Us Different

[!TIP]
Government-Grade Compliance: Forward Email is Section 889 compliant and serves organizations like the US Naval Academy, demonstrating our commitment to meeting stringent federal security requirements.


[!NOTE]
OpenPGP and OpenWKD Implementation: Unlike Fastmail, which refuses to implement PGP citing complexity concerns, Forward Email provides full OpenPGP support with OpenWKD (Web Key Directory) compliance, giving users the encryption they actually want without forcing them to use experimental protocols like JMAP.

Technical Stack Comparison:
graph TD
    A[Proton Mail Stack] --> B[Postfix SMTP Server]
    A --> C[Custom Encryption Layer]
    A --> D[Web Interface]
E[Forward Email Stack] --> F[100% Custom Node.js]
E --> G[JavaScript Throughout]
E --> H[Built From Scratch]

B --> I[1980s C code]
C --> J[Glue code required]
D --> K[Integration complexity]

F --> L[Modern language]
G --> M[No glue code needed]
H --> N[Web-native design]



= APNIC blog post confirms Proton uses postfix-mta-sts-resolver, indicating they run a Postfix stack

Key Differences:

Modern language: JavaScript across the entire stack vs. 1980s C code
No glue code: Single language eliminates integration complexity
Web-native: Built for modern web development from the ground up
Maintainable: Any web developer can understand and contribute
No legacy debt: Clean, modern codebase without decades of patches


[!NOTE]
Privacy by Design: Our privacy policy ensures we don't store forwarded emails to disk storage or databases, don't store metadata about emails, and don't store logs or IP addresses - operating in-memory only for email forwarding services.

Technical Documentation: For comprehensive details on our approach, architecture, and security implementation, see our technical whitepaper and extensive technical documentation.
Email Service Provider Comparison: Growth Through Proven Protocols

[!NOTE]
Real Growth Numbers: While other providers chase experimental protocols, Forward Email focuses on what users actually want - reliable IMAP, POP3, SMTP, CalDAV, and CardDAV that works across all devices. Our growth demonstrates the value of this approach.

Provider
Domain Names (2024 via SecurityTrails)
Domain Names (2025 via ViewDNS)
Percentage Change
MX Record
Forward Email
418,477
506,653
+21.1%
mx1.forwardemail.net
Proton Mail
253,977
334,909
+31.9%
mail.protonmail.ch
Fastmail
168,433
192,075
+14%
in1-smtp.messagingengine.com
Mailbox
38,659
43,337
+12.1%
mxext1.mailbox.org
Tuta
18,781
21,720
+15.6%
mail.tutanota.de
Skiff (defunct)
7,504
3,361
-55.2%
inbound-smtp.skiff.com
Key Insights:

Forward Email shows strong growth (+21.1%) with over 500K domains using our MX records
Proven infrastructure wins: Services with reliable IMAP/SMTP show consistent domain adoption
JMAP irrelevance: Fastmail's JMAP investment shows slower growth (+14%) compared to providers focusing on standard protocols
Skiff's collapse: The defunct startup lost 55.2% of domains, demonstrating the failure of "revolutionary" email approaches
Market validation: Domain count growth reflects real user adoption, not marketing metrics

The Technical Timeline
Based on our official company timeline, here's how we've built email infrastructure that actually works:
timeline
    title Forward Email Development Timeline
    2017 : October 2nd - Domain purchased : November 5th - 634-line JavaScript file created : November - Official launch with DNS-based forwarding
    2018 : April - Switched to Cloudflare DNS for privacy : October - Gmail and Outlook "Send Mail As" integration
    2019 : May - v2 release with performance improvements using Node.js streams
    2020 : February - Enhanced Privacy Protection plan : April - Spam Scanner alpha release and 2FA : May - Custom port forwarding and RESTful API : August - ARC email authentication support : November 23rd - Public launch out of beta
    2021 : February - 100% JavaScript/Node.js stack (removed Python) : September 27th - Regular expression alias support
    2023 : January - Redesigned website : February - Error logs and dark mode : March - Tangerine integration and DNS over HTTPS : April - New infrastructure with bare metal servers : May - Outbound SMTP feature launch : November - Encrypted mailbox storage with IMAP support : December - POP3, passkeys, WebAuthn, and OpenPGP support
    2024 : February - CalDAV support : March-July - IMAP/POP3/CalDAV optimizations : July - iOS Push support and TTI monitoring : August - EML/Mbox export and webhook signatures : September-January 2025 - Vacation responder and OpenPGP/WKD encryption

Why We Succeed Where Others Fail

We build infrastructure, not apps: Focus on servers and protocols
We enhance, don't replace: Work with existing email clients
We're profitable: No VC pressure to "grow fast and break things"
We understand email: 7+ years of deep technical experience
We serve developers: APIs and tools that actually solve problems

The Cost Reality Check
graph TD
    A[Typical Email Startup] --> B[$500K-2M per month burn]
    A --> C[20-50 employees]
    A --> D[Expensive office space]
    A --> E[Marketing costs]
F[Forward Email] --> G[Profitable from day one]
F --> H[Small focused team]
F --> I[Remote-first, low overhead]
F --> J[Organic growth]


Security Challenges in Email Infrastructure

[!IMPORTANT]
Quantum-Safe Email Security: Forward Email is the world's first and only email service to use quantum-resistant and individually encrypted SQLite mailboxes, providing unprecedented security against future quantum computing threats.

Email security is a complex challenge that affects all providers in the industry. Rather than highlighting individual incidents, it's more valuable to understand the common security considerations that all email infrastructure providers must address.
Common Security Considerations
All email providers face similar security challenges:

Data protection: Securing user data and communications
Access control: Managing authentication and authorization
Infrastructure security: Protecting servers and databases
Compliance: Meeting various regulatory requirements like GDPR 和 CCPA


[!NOTE]
Advanced Encryption: Our security practices include ChaCha20-Poly1305 encryption for mailboxes, full disk encryption with LUKS v2, and comprehensive protection with encryption-at-rest, encryption-in-memory, and encryption-in-transit.

The Value of Transparency
When security incidents occur, the most valuable response is transparency and quick action. Companies that:

Disclose incidents promptly: Help users make informed decisions
Provide detailed timelines: Show they understand the scope of issues
Implement fixes quickly: Demonstrate technical competence
Share lessons learned: Contribute to industry-wide security improvements

These responses benefit the entire email ecosystem by promoting best practices and encouraging other providers to maintain high security standards.
Ongoing Security Challenges
The email industry continues to evolve its security practices:

Encryption standards: Implementing better encryption methods like TLS 1.3
Authentication protocols: Improving DKIM, SPF和 DMARC
Threat detection: Developing better spam and phishing filters
Infrastructure hardening: Securing servers and databases
Domain reputation management: Dealing with unprecedented spam from Microsoft's onmicrosoft.com domain requiring arbitrary blocking rules 和 additional MSP discussions

These challenges require ongoing investment and expertise from all providers in the space.
Conclusion: Focus on Infrastructure, Not Apps
The Evidence Is Clear
After analyzing hundreds of email startups:

80%+ failure rate: Most email startups fail completely (this figure is likely WAY higher than 80%; we're being nice)
Client apps usually fail: Being acquired usually means death for email clients
Infrastructure can succeed: Companies building SMTP/API services often thrive
VC funding creates pressure: Venture capital creates unrealistic growth expectations
Technical debt accumulates: Building email infrastructure is harder than it looks

The Historical Context
Email has been "dying" for 20+ years according to startups:

2004: "Social networks will replace email"
2008: "Mobile messaging will kill email"
2012: "Slack will replace email"
2016: "AI will revolutionize email"
2020: "Remote work needs new communication tools"
2024: "AI will finally fix email"

Email is still here. It's still growing. It's still essential.
The Real Lesson
The lesson isn't that email can't be improved. It's about choosing the right approach:

Email protocols work: SMTP, IMAP, POP3 are battle-tested
Infrastructure matters: Reliability and performance beat flashy features
Enhancement beats replacement: Work with email, don't fight it
Sustainability beats growth: Profitable businesses outlast VC-funded ones
Serve developers: Tools and APIs create more value than end-user apps

The opportunity: Better implementation of proven protocols, not protocol replacement.

[!TIP]
Comprehensive Email Service Analysis: For an in-depth comparison of 79 email services in 2025, including detailed reviews, screenshots, and technical analysis, see our comprehensive guide: 79 Best Email Services. This analysis demonstrates why Forward Email consistently ranks as the recommended choice for reliability, security, and standards compliance.


[!NOTE]
Real-World Validation: Our approach works for organizations ranging from government agencies requiring Section 889 compliance 切换到 major universities managing tens of thousands of alumni addresses, proving that building reliable infrastructure is the path to email success.

If you're thinking about building an email startup, consider building email infrastructure instead. The world needs better email servers, not more email apps.
The Extended Email Graveyard: More Failures and Shutdowns
Google's Email Experiments Gone Wrong
Google, despite owning Gmail, has killed multiple email projects:

Google Wave (2009-2012): "Email killer" that nobody understood
Google Buzz (2010-2011): Social email integration disaster
Inbox by Gmail  (2014-2019): Gmail's "smart" successor, abandoned
Google+ email features (2011-2019): Social network email integration

Pattern: Even Google can't successfully reinvent email.
The Serial Failure: Newton Mail's Three Deaths
Newton Mail died three times:

CloudMagic (2013-2016): Email client acquired by Newton
Newton Mail (2016-2018): Rebranded, subscription model failed
Newton Mail Revival (2019-2020): Attempted comeback, failed again

Lesson: Email clients can't sustain subscription models.
The Apps That Never Launched
Many email startups died before launching:

Tempo (2014): Calendar-email integration, shut down pre-launch
Mailstrom (2011): Email management tool, acquired before release
Fluent (2013): Email client, development stopped

The Acquisition-to-Shutdown Pattern

Sparrow → Google → Shutdown (2012-2013)
reMail → Google → Shutdown (2010-2011)
Mailbox → Dropbox → Shutdown (2013-2015)
Accompli → Microsoft → Shutdown (became Outlook Mobile)
Acompli → Microsoft → Integrated (rare success)

Email Infrastructure Consolidation

Postbox → eM Client (2024): Postbox immediately shut down after acquisition
Multiple acquisitions: ImprovMX has been acquired multiple times, with privacy concerns raised 和 acquisition announcements 和 business listings
Service degradation: Many services get worse after acquisition

The Open-Source Email Graveyard: When "Free" Isn't Sustainable
Nylas Mail → Mailspring: The Fork That Couldn't

Nylas Mail: Open-source email client, discontinued 2017 and had massive memory usage issues
Mailspring: Community fork, struggling with maintenance and high RAM usage issues
Reality: Open-source email clients can't compete with native apps

Eudora: The 18-Year Death March

1988-2006: Dominant email client for Mac/Windows
2006: Qualcomm stopped development
2007: Open-sourced as "Eudora OSE"
2010: Project abandoned
Lesson: Even successful email clients eventually die

FairEmail: Killed by Google Play Politics

FairEmail: Privacy-focused Android email client
Google Play: Banned for "violating policies"
Reality: Platform policies can kill email apps instantly

The Maintenance Problem
Open-source email projects fail because:

Complexity: Email protocols are complex to implement correctly
Security: Constant security updates required
Compatibility: Must work with all email providers
Resources: Volunteer developers burnout

The AI Email Startup Surge: History Repeating with "Intelligence"
The Current AI Email Gold Rush
2024's AI email startups:

Superhuman: $33M raised, acquired by Grammarly (2025)
Shortwave: Y Combinator, Gmail + AI
SaneBox: AI email filtering (actually profitable)
Boomerang: AI scheduling and responses
Mail-0/Zero: AI-powered email client startup building yet another email interface
Inbox Zero: Open-source AI email assistant attempting to automate email management

The Funding Frenzy
VCs are throwing money at "AI + Email":

$100M+ invested in AI email startups in 2024
Same promises: "Revolutionary email experience"
Same problems: Building on top of existing infrastructure
Same outcome: Most will fail within 3 years

Why They'll All Fail (Again)

AI doesn't solve email's non-problems: Email works fine
Gmail already has AI: Smart replies, priority inbox, spam filtering
Privacy concerns: AI requires reading all your emails
Cost structure: AI processing is expensive, email is commodity
Network effects: Can't break Gmail/Outlook dominance

The Inevitable Outcome

2025: Superhuman successfully acquired by Grammarly - a rare successful exit for an email client
2025-2026: Most remaining AI email startups will pivot or shut down
2027: Survivors will be acquired, with mixed outcomes
2028: "Blockchain email" or the next trend will emerge

The Consolidation Catastrophe: When "Survivors" Become Disasters
The Great Email Service Consolidation
The email industry has consolidated dramatically:

ActiveCampaign acquired Postmark (2022)
Sinch acquired Mailgun (2021)
Twilio acquired SendGrid (2019)
Multiple ImprovMX acquisitions (ongoing) with privacy concerns 和 acquisition announcements 和 business listings

Outlook: The "Survivor" That Can't Stop Breaking
Microsoft Outlook, despite being a "survivor," has constant issues:

Memory leaks: Outlook consumes gigabytes of RAM 和 requires frequent restarts
Sync problems: Emails disappear and reappear randomly
Performance issues: Slow startup, frequent crashes
Compatibility problems: Breaks with third-party email providers

Our Real-World Experience: We regularly help customers whose Outlook setups break our perfectly compliant IMAP implementation.
The Postmark Infrastructure Problem
After ActiveCampaign's acquisition:

SSL Certificate Failure: Nearly 10-hour outage in September 2024 due to expired SSL certificates
User Rejections: Marc Köhlbrugge getting rejected despite legitimate usage
Developer Exodus: @levelsio stating "Amazon SES is our last hope"
MailGun Issues: Scott reported: "The worst service from @Mail_Gun... we've not been able to send emails for 2 weeks"

Recent Email Client Casualties (2024-2025)
Postbox → eM Client Acquisition: In 2024, eM Client acquired Postbox and immediately shut it down, forcing thousands of users to migrate.
Canary Mail Issues: Despite Sequoia backing, users report non-working features and poor customer support.
Spark by Readdle: Users increasingly report poor experience with the email client.
Mailbird Licensing Problems: Windows users face licensing issues and subscription confusion.
Airmail Decline: The Mac/iOS email client, based on the failed Sparrow codebase, continues to receive poor reviews for reliability issues.
Email Extension and Service Acquisitions
HubSpot Sidekick → Discontinued: HubSpot's email tracking extension was discontinued in 2016 and replaced with "HubSpot Sales."
Engage for Gmail → Retired: Salesforce's Gmail extension was retired in June 2024, forcing users to migrate to other solutions.
The Survivors: Email Companies That Actually Work
Not all email companies fail. Here are the ones that actually work:
Mailmodo: Y Combinator success story, $2M from Sequoia's Surge by focusing on interactive email campaigns.
Mixmax: Raised $13.3M total funding and continues operating as a successful sales engagement platform.
Outreach.io: Reached $4.4B+ valuation and is preparing for potential IPO as a sales engagement platform.
Apollo.io: Achieved $1.6B valuation with $100M Series D in 2023 for their sales intelligence platform.
GMass: Bootstrap success story generating $140K/month as a Gmail extension for email marketing.
Streak CRM: Successful Gmail-based CRM that's been operating since 2012 without major issues.
ToutApp: Successfully acquired by Marketo in 2017 after raising $15M+ in funding.
Bananatag: Acquired by Staffbase in 2021 and continues operating as "Staffbase Email."
Key Pattern: These companies succeed because they enhance existing email workflows rather than trying to replace email entirely. They build tools that work with email infrastructure, not against it.

[!TIP]
Don't see a provider you know of mentioned here? (e.g. Posteo, Mailbox.org, Migadu, etc.) Refer to our comprehensive email service comparison page for more insight.